I did not produce this video but I'd sure like to shake the hand of the guy/gal who did. It focuses on a person who produced a degree of chaos here a while back and was subsequently banned. I see that he's recently reduced the James Family Genealogy Forum on genealogy.com to an advertisement for his misidentified collection just as he tried to do on here. Having studied many other areas of history, I remain amazed at the number of absolute nutbags, besides the normal honest folks, that Jesse James seems to attract. Anyway, it's good to see this particular scammer exposed on YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHYBkPyT080
Mel
Tags:
Permalink Reply by C. F. 'Charley' Eckhardt on March 10, 2010 at 1:15pm
Permalink Reply by Irvin Blankenship on March 10, 2010 at 4:01pm
Permalink Reply by Fran Bolton on January 25, 2011 at 12:02pm I did not understand the reply layout here at first, but I think I have now. The replies to the main discussion start at the left, under the Discussion. Each reply is indented to indicate which reply was replied to. Correct?
Discussion
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Fran
Permalink Reply by Carolyn A.S. Holmes on January 25, 2011 at 12:16pm
Permalink Reply by Carolyn A.S. Holmes on January 10, 2011 at 3:58pm
Permalink Reply by Fran Bolton on January 10, 2011 at 5:44pm Carolyn, I believe it is only a matter of time until the web of those researching the Ebay group photo featuring Zerelda in the center will document, not guess, the names of those in the photo with her.
It has already been dated by those in the web as most likely 1888-1889, when Caroline Quantrill visited that area of MO and lived with various Quantrill men's families during that year. This alone shows Jesse James cannot be in the photo. Frank lived in Dallas at that time, and was balding, so it is possible he was not in the photo, even though his wife may be. A local newspaper article of the time said she was a guest of the Ralston family at that time. No mention of Frank being a guest.
Dating the photo at 1888-1889 does not make it possible for the man in the mustache and dark suit sitting on the ground to be James L Courtney, claimed by his gr-granddaughter to be JJ, as the photo used to compare the two men is NOT James L Courtney, but his brother-in-law Travis Barron. Scrambled Eggs!
Fran
Permalink Reply by Carolyn A.S. Holmes on January 10, 2011 at 5:46pm
Permalink Reply by Fran Bolton on January 10, 2011 at 10:56pm "I'll supply the ham" you say!
You can store it here, next to Quantrill's reconstructed, wax head:
http://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/10054
Fran
Permalink Reply by Carolyn A.S. Holmes on January 10, 2011 at 11:07pm I have a head that looks just like that. Looks like history is going to be changed over the latest ebay photo. Perhaps next Mt. Rushmore will need to come down and be replace by....heck you know. The famous 4. I bet the James Farm gets moved to Texas.
This could be intersting.
Permalink Reply by Carolyn A.S. Holmes on January 10, 2011 at 5:49pm
Permalink Reply by Fran Bolton on January 10, 2011 at 5:59pm The music will be treated more like water off a duck's back.
But, the dissappointment will be huge, if one gets over excited in the beginning at the possibilities of the photo, and publishes it's imagined merits that are guesses before any proof is found of the people posing. It is a copy photo by the way, other's exist, so it is just a matter of throwing the net far and wide enough to snag one that IDs the complete group.
Fran
© 2013 Created by True West.